Official notification and results will be posted.
Overall grade
| Ranking | Car No. | School name | total Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | Kyoto Institute of Technology | 913.57 |
| 2 | 3 | Kyoto University | 760.26 |
| 3 | 13 | Japan Automobile College | 673.33 |
General award
| Award name | Award-winning school | Outline | 提供 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Excellence Award | 1st place: Kyoto Institute of Technology 2st place: Kyoto University 3nd place: Japan Automobile College |
The top three teams that participated in all the judging sessions and received the highest overall scores | Ono Sokki |
| Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Award | Kyoto Institute of Technology | The team that participated in all the judging and received the highest overall score | Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry |
| Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism Award | Shizuoka Science and Technology EV | The team that participates in all judging and has the highest overall score in the EV class | Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism |
| Shizuoka Prefecture Governor's Award | Nippon Institute of Technology | The team with the highest scores in static tests, dynamic tests excluding endurance driving, noise, energy efficiency, safety, and weight reduction efforts | Shizuoka Prefecture |
| Kakegawa Mayor Award | Kyoto Institute of Technology | The team with the highest dynamic score | Kakegawa |
| Mayor Fukuroi Award | Kyoto Institute of Technology | The team with the highest static score | Fukuroi |
| Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association Chairman's Award | Kyoto University Chiba University Niigata University Japan Automobile College Ibaraki University Kyushu Institute of Technology Saitama University Sanyo Onoda City Yamaguchi Tokyo University of Science Teikyo University Kogakuin University Nippon Institute of Technology Toyama University Honda Technical College Kanto Tokyo Metropolitan University Shizuoka Science and Technology EV Toyota Tokyo Automobile College EV |
Teams that have participated in and completed all static and dynamic tests (no late documentation or noise penalties after completing the Endurance test) | Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association |
| Japan Auto Parts Industries Association Chairman Award | Kyoto Institute of Technology | Among the teams that completed the Endurance race, the team with the highest evaluation points in cost evaluation, presentation evaluation, and weight reduction | Japan Auto Parts Industry Association |
| ICV Overall Excellence Award | Kyoto Institute of Technology | The team that participated in all judging and received the highest overall score in the ICV class. | JSAE |
| EV overall excellence award | Shizuoka Science and Technology EV | The team that participated in all judging and received the highest overall score in the EV class | Pues Shizuoka Prefecture |
Awards by category
| Award name | Award-winning school | Outline | 提供 |
|---|---|---|---|
| design award | 1st place: Kyoto Institute of Technology 2th place: Osaka University 3nd place: Nagoya University EV |
The team with the highest design score | Tokyo R&D |
| cost award | 1st place: Kyoto Institute of Technology 2st place: Kyoto University 3th place: Kobe University |
The team with the highest score in the cost and manufacturing evaluation | NOK |
| presentation award | 1st place: Kyoto Institute of Technology 2st place: Gifu University 3th place: Osaka University |
Team with the highest score in the presentation screening | JSAE |
| Acceleration performance award | 1rd place: Chiba University 2st place: Kyoto Institute of Technology 3nd place: Japan Automobile College |
The team with the highest score in the acceleration test | Sumitomo Rubber Industries |
| skidpad award | 1st place: Kyoto Institute of Technology 2nd place: Meijo University 3rd place: Chiba University |
The team with the highest skidpad score | JSAE |
| autocross award | 1st place: Kyoto Institute of Technology 2nd place: Meijo University 3st place: Gifu University |
The team with the highest score in the autocross competition | JSAE |
| Endurance running award | 1st place: Kyoto Institute of Technology 2st place: Kyoto University 3nd place: Meijo University |
The team with the highest score in the endurance test | JSAE |
| energy saving award | 1st place: Shizuoka Institute of Science and Technology EV 2nd place: Toyota Tokyo Automobile College EV 3rd place: Nippon Institute of Technology |
The team with the highest score in the consumer efficiency review | japan michelin tires |
Special recognition
| Award name | Award-winning school | Outline | 提供 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sportsmanship Award | Nissan Kyoto Automobile Technical College | Teams with high ratings for sportsmanship, management, safety, etc. | Tournament executive committee |
| Rookie award | ICV Class: Not applicable EV class: Shizuoka University EV |
The team with the highest overall score in their first time participating in the Japan Tournament | Tournament executive committee |
| jump up award | 1st place: Kyoto Institute of Technology | The team that participated in all judging and improved their overall score the most compared to the previous competition. | Fukuroi Chamber of Commerce and Industry |
| Lightest weight award (ICV) | Osaka Institute of Technology | The lightest vehicle team that participated in all judging except Endurance | Fukai Seisakusho |
| Lightest weight award (EV) | Shizuoka Science and Technology EV | ||
| CAE Special Award | 1st place: Kyoto University 2nd place: Nagoya University EV 3rd place: Doshisha University |
A team that effectively utilized CAE technology to achieve an efficient and excellent design. | althea engineering |
| Best three-view drawing award | 1rd place: Toyohashi University of Technology EV 2st place: Kyoto University 3th place: Osaka University |
The team that accurately conveyed the most information to the judges through "drawings," which are the culmination of design activities. | Tokyo R&D |
| Best Aero Award | 1st place: Kyoto University 2st place: Kyoto Institute of Technology 3rd place: Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology |
Among the teams that completed the autocross race, this was the team that carried out and implemented the most effective aerodynamic and thermal fluid analysis for a racing car. | Tokyo R&D |
| Best composite award | 1th place: Osaka University 2st place: Kyoto University 3rd place: Toyohashi University of Technology EV |
A team that has created the most complete composite parts for a racing car in terms of weight reduction, strength/rigidity, appearance, etc. | Toray Carbon Magic |
| ergonomics award | 1st place: Kyoto University 2nd place: Ibaraki University 3st place: Kyoto Institute of Technology |
The team has achieved an ergonomic design with excellent racing car driving position, operability of the pedals and steering wheel, and visibility of the meters. | Brid |
| Best Vehicle Inspection Award | 1nd place: Kyushu Institute of Technology 2rd place: University of Tokyo 3rd place: Nagoya Institute of Technology |
The team with the highest overall score among the teams with the highest vehicle inspection document (SES) passing rating. | Aneburu |
List of official notifications
- No.27 - Formula SAE Japan Awards
- No.26 - Overall Result
- No.25 - Efficiency Event Result
- No.24 - Endurance Event Result
- No.23 - Design Final Event Result
- No.22 - Endurance Event Run Order
- No.21 - Autocross Event Result
- No.20 - Changes to Local Rule No. 2
- No.19 - Skidpad Event Result
- No.18 - Acceleration Event Result
- No.17 - Cost & Manufacturing Event Result
- No.16 - Presentation Event Result
- No.15 - Design Event Result
- No.14 - ShakedownCertificationResult
- No.13 - ESA-ESO_SES_IAD_ESF_FMEA_Result
- No.12 - Restrictions on entry to vehicle inspection area
- No.11 - Notice of official mock inspection during the tournament (2nd report)
- No.10 - Restrictions on attendance during the event
- No.9 - Notice of official mock inspection during the tournament
- No.8 - Static Document screening result / Online sessions
- No.7 - Information about local events
- No.6 - Notice of change in policy regarding screening results after the SES resubmission deadline (2nd round)
- No.5 - Conditions and timing for canceling on-site events due to the impact of COVID-19
- No.4 - Notice of relaxation of submission contents due to the influence of the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19)
- No.3 - Definition of the new standard honeycomb impact attenuator
- No.2 - Local event schedule
- No.1 - Accepting overseas teams